contemporary liberal
AG Mulgaokar
How AG Mulgaokar is discussed in this archive
Authored 1 work in the archive.
Referenced in 1 other work — including IS RIGHT TO PROPERTY NOT FUNDAMENTAL? .
In IS RIGHT TO PROPERTY NOT FUNDAMENTAL? : Mulgaokar's December 1969 Freedom First essay — reprinted as the booklet's third section — re-frames the property debate around what 'fundamental' can mean if such a right can be abridged by ordinary legislation, and addresses a procedural-constitutional argument directly to President V.
By AG Mulgaokar (1)
Mentioned in (1)
Primary works (1)
- IS RIGHT TO PROPERTY NOT FUNDAMENTAL? · 1970
- "Mulgaokar's essay (Section III, reprinted from the December 1969 issue of Freedom First) re-frames the property debate around what 'fundamental' can possibly mean if a fundamental right can be restricted away by ordinary legislative process." — opens the description of Mulgaokar's third essay and his central question
- "Mulgaokar invokes the 1910 Asquith/Lloyd George precedent — where the Crown insisted on a fresh general election before agreeing to create peers and pass the Budget and the Parliament Act — to argue that major constitutional change requires a popular mandate." — shows the British-constitutional analogy at the heart of Mulgaokar's case against amending the property right without a mandate